I didn’t fight for this country for Keir Starmer to drag UK into an EU Army

Keir Starmer’s quiet march toward re-ensnaring Britain in the grip of EU bureaucracy is nothing short of a betrayal of everything stood for.

It is no secret that has long harboured ambitions for significantly closer ties with the . A staunch Remainer, his vision for Britain seems less like a post- independence and more like a creeping re-entry into EU structures — not by name, but certainly in practice.

Recent reports surrounding Starmer’s discussions with European leaders highlight a disturbing trajectory: a willingness to entertain the EU’s proposed £420 billion defence pact.

This initiative, spearheaded by Poland and supported by the European Commission, aims to pool resources for a collective European defence effort. While ostensibly addressing pressing threats like Russian aggression, this move veers dangerously close to forming an EU army — something the UK emphatically rejected by .

Starmer’s cozying up to EU leaders is more than a pragmatic approach to shared security concerns.

It is a thinly veiled attempt to align the UK with European defence ambitions. Despite his denial of plans to create a European army, his actions suggest otherwise. The timing is telling — Starmer’s defence review is delayed, and pressure is mounting to increase military spending amidst a global climate of instability.

With wars in and and the looming shadow of Russian aggression, the need for robust defence investment is unquestionable. However, tying the UK’s security strategy to Brussels is not the solution.

This so-called “intergovernmental agreement” is a backdoor mechanism to draw the UK into EU structures. It offers participation to non-EU nations like Britain and Norway while allowing neutral countries such as Ireland to opt out.

This tactical flexibility is designed to entice reluctant players like the UK into an arrangement that reeks of EU centralisation, using Britain’s strained finances as leverage.

Starmer’s willingness to entertain this pact undermines Britain’s hard-won sovereignty. was a declaration of independence from European bureaucratic overreach, yet here we are, with our Prime Minister holding hands with Donald Tusk, who openly dreams of a “Breturn.”

Tusk’s remarks during their recent press conference — expressing hope for the UK’s eventual return to the EU — should send chills down the spine of anyone who values British independence.

The defence pact’s staggering price tag, overseen by the European Investment Bank, further highlights the folly of this scheme.

The UK has already committed significant resources to NATO and bilateral defence agreements, including £8 billion in Polish defence deals over the past three years.

Why, then, should Britain fund a duplicative EU program that undermines NATO’s primacy and funnels control to Brussels?

Starmer’s actions betray not only British sovereignty but also the trust of our armed forces. His willingness to consider aligning with the EU defence initiative smacks of desperation — a misguided attempt to gain favour with European elites while neglecting the very real needs of Britain’s military.

Increased defence spending is vital, but it must prioritise national interests, not bolster a European army in disguise.

The EU’s defence pact is not about solidarity or security — it is about centralisation. Britain must resist being dragged into this quagmire. ’s ambitions are not only reckless but a betrayal of the mandate.

Britain’s future lies in global independence, not as a subordinate player in a European superstate.

If Starmer gets his way, Britain will trade its hard-won independence for the shackles of a European superstate — we must stop him before it’s too late.

Richard Thomson was the Reform UK candidate for Braintree in the 2024 General Election