British troops to remain in Ukraine for ‘years’ as Starmer’s peace commitment open-ended

Sir Keir Starmer is pulling a peacekeeping mission with the ‘coalition of the willing’. (Image: Getty)

British troops could remain in Ukraine for “years” if Sir is successful in securing a peacekeeping mission to protect a ceasefire deal. A senior government source revealed that the peace plan, which is likely to involve other Kyiv allies, is currently open-ended and will go on for “as long as it takes”. They told : “It would be a long-term commitment, we are talking about years. As long as it takes to preserve a peace deal and deter .”

This could be part of a commitment – a partnership of ‘s allies – to ensure does not break the terms of a future ceasefire or launch another invasion. Some of the member nations could send up to 30,000 troops to , while others could assist with military aid in the form of weapons and logistics.

:

NATO "Brilliant Jump

A source said the peacekeeping force could be in Ukraine for ‘years’. (Image: Getty)

The Prime Minister has not yet disclosed the “rules of engagement” for such a peacekeeping mission, but this is likely to be discussed on Thursday during the next meeting of the coalition.

The London meeting will explore “in great specificty” to protect a ceasefire “in the air and at sea”.

However, has repeatedly maintained it would not accept foreign troops involved in the conflict.

Most recently, Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Security Council of , threatened a “war with NATO” over a peacekeeping mission in .

[POLL] [REPORT]

He wrote on X: “Macron and Starmer are playing dumb. Time and again they are told that peacekeepers must be from non-NATO states.”

Repeating the Russian propaganda claim that the Ukrainian government is riddled with neo-Nazi wants to eradicate, he added: “No, we will send tens of thousands – just lay it out – you want to give military aid to the neo-Nazis in Kiev. .”

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko added that any force sent to must be “unarmed”.

He said: “We absolutely do not care under what label NATO contingents may be deployed on the territory of : be it the , NATO or in a national capacity.

“In any case, if they appear there, it means that they are deployed in a conflict zone with all the consequences for these contingents as a party to the conflict.”

Related Posts


This will close in 0 seconds