Prince Harry will fly to Canada next month for the 2025 Invictus Games
should attend a major event alone without his wife Meghan Markle next month, royal fans have said.
In a , readers were asked whether Meghan, 43, should accompany Harry, 40, to the 2025 Invictus Games.
The event will take place next month in British Columbia, Canada, next month from February 8th until the 16th. The Duke of Sussex, who founded The Invictus Games in 2014, attends the event every year.
Meghan has also attended each year despite not being involved in the project. It is believed she enjoys going and likes to support Harry.
However, after the couple after the publication of , royal fans believe the duchess should not attend the event this time round.
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy
This verdict comes after the article saw on ex staff, with an insider claiming that some past employees needed “long-term therapy” after working for the former Suits actress.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have not commented on these claims.
In the Express poll, which ran from 2pm on January 22nd until 9am on January 24th, 3,638 ( 94 per cent) people said that Meghan should not join for the Invictus Games this year.
Only 187 voters – five percent – believed the duchess should attend, while 29 people said they were unsure.
Don’t miss… [DETAIL]
The couple usually attend the event together
A similar uncertainty was held by PR expert and GoUp’s Edward Coram-James, that the duchess will most likely face criticism either way.
He said: “Meghan attending could be a statement of unity – or a distraction. The Sussex brand is damaged, no doubt about it.
“So, when they appear together, they bring baggage. Meghan attending could overshadow what the Games are about – veterans, not royal drama.
“On the flip side, if Meghan doesn’t attend, people will inevitably speculate – “Are they growing apart? Are the Sussexes in trouble? She’s in a damned-if-she-does, damned-if-she-doesn’t situation.”