Douglas Todd: Often criticized, the giant institutions that operate many purpose-built rental buildings, including in B.C., are taking risks. They’re frequently encouraged by governments.
The Liberals, and the Conservatives before them, have long encouraged the creation of real estate investment trusts, commonly known as REITs, through which corporations “make a killing,” Kwan said.
“Real estate investment trusts enjoy preferential tax treatment, and the seven largest REITs alone have saved a combined $1.5 billion through federal tax loopholes,” Kwan said in a private member’s bill.
The then-NDP housing critic called for a moratorium “on the acquisition of affordable homes by financialized landlords, including REITs and other corporate firms,” which she said hold more than 330,000 units of purpose-built rental stock. REITs’ tax rebates, she said, should instead go into social housing.
But readers likely won’t be surprised to hear that the property development industry, and many politicians, don’t have trouble with REITs. Or with the insurance companies and pension funds that often finance and manage much of the country’s purpose-built rental housing.
“Saying that REITs financialize housing is naïve. It’s also unfortunately political,” said Robert Moore of Dexter Realty.
In most cases, Moore said, the eventual owners and operators of most of the hundreds of new rental towers being proposed for Metro Vancouver — including within the drastically upzoned Broadway corridor and around SkyTrain stations — will indeed be REITs, pension funds, insurance companies and other well-capitalized financial institutions.
These kind of organizations, which are usually multinational, typically move in after real-estate speculators and developers spend years buying up land for rental apartment blocks and then getting them off the ground.
“And that’s a good thing. It means stability and balance, something housing markets need. Canadians are invested in many of these organizations through their RSPs and mutual funds,” Moore said.
Like it or not, it’s just the way things actually get built in our mixed economy.
Indeed, although Moore didn’t mention it, Quadreal Property Group, the fast-growing real estate arm of the B.C. government’s public pension fund, is heavily involved in financing rental towers.
They include the Senawk highrises, which are being built by the Squamish First Nation in Vancouver’s Kitsilano neighbourhood, and the mammoth Oakridge Park housing and rental project, which both include a small proportion of below-market units. Quadreal’s assets are worth $85 billion.
As realtor estate analysts Steve Saretsky and David Hutchinson say, putting a downpayment on a pre-sale condo only makes sense when you can assume its price will rise year after year. But those days are over.
A positive thing about REITs and pension funds owning large rental blocks, said Moore, is they “take a long-term view. Vancouver has proven a resilient, low-risk market in which conservative investors can secure and hold assets for the long term.”
Moore maintained the REITs, insurance companies and pension funds involved in purpose-built rentals are “not about raising rents. They are dutiful professional landlords. They take care of common areas and components like boilers, elevators and roofs.”
As a case in point, he cited the decades-old residential towers in the West End of Vancouver, saying they are mostly run by large institutions and generally offer affordable rents and well-maintained buildings.
UBC business professor Thomas Davidoff tends to agree, in part because it has become increasingly unwise for individual investors to dive into what was the condo craze.
“Unless one is extraordinarily wealthy, putting a large chunk of net worth into a single apartment in a single building in a single location, to be built by a single developer, puts a lot of eggs into one basket. It’s the opposite of financial diversification.”
While Davidoff knows REITs, pension funds and hedge funds “get beaten up in popular discourse,” he maintains they offer individuals a prudent “opportunity to invest in a diversified pool of apartments.”
Still, it’s not as if investing in rental towers is a walk in the financial park. Many things can mess up profit margins.
Vancouver developer John D’Eathe, for instance, says one down side for owners of rental apartment blocks is that the B.C. government, like many across Canada, restricts when and how much tenants can be charged. The B.C. government currently sets annual rent increases at 3.5 per cent per year.
And given the high cost of land in Metro Vancouver, especially within the upzoned boundaries of the Broadway plan and SkyTrain stations, community planner Michael Geller said he is “not so certain about the depth of demand for apartments renting for $4,000, $5,000 and $6,000 per month. That’s the necessary rent to make many of these new buildings financially affordable.”
The total cost for the typical 20-storey rental tower projects being proposed these days is about $125 million, says Moore.
Given the astronomical stakes, Moore said developers “above all must be excellent risk managers. Risk comes from all directions — political risk, financing risk, construction cost risk, rezoning risk and many risks beyond their control. Any mistake can cost the developer their profit.”
Using a complex financial formula known as a “proforma,” rental developers calculate how much interest they can afford to pay on land, construction, taxes and fees so that institutional operators will eventually be able to charge tenants, in most cases, less than $6 per square foot per month.
In regard to the gargantuan Broadway plan, which covers 500 square blocks between Clark Drive and Vine Street, 1st and 16th Avenues, Moore said developers face the cost of being responsible for tenants who lose their homes, which is leading to the “prioritization of projects which displace the fewest tenants.”
Despite being scolded over their sometimes big profits, Moore said most of the corporations behind the new wave of purpose-built rental apartments in Metro are simply responding to “the population growth that was thrust upon us by the federal government’s” migration policies.
While some residents, he said, “long for the 1980s — and don’t we all miss the easy traffic commutes — those days are gone. Vancouver is planning for the 2050s and, yes, the city will look different.”